Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.220
Filtrar
1.
Acta Biomed ; 94(S3): e2023182, 2023 08 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695183

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: as a reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, countries all over the world have undertaken wide-scale measures to prevent and limit the spread of the virus. Suggested preventative measures mainly included "lockdown", social distancing, wearing facemasks, and vaccinations. The success of these measures was widely dependent on the cooperation of citizens. However, people reacted differently to the several types of restrictions and recommendations. Even if the majority followed the rules, others ignored them. This study aims to investigate the reasons for the compliance or violation of the rules developed to fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. METHODS: to answer the research question, the analysis of two different surveys conducted on a representative sample of Italians (N=2000) were conducted and analysed through descriptive statistics. RESULTS: the data collection agreed with published literature. Compliance with rules during emergencies followed diligence and altruistic patterns. Fear of sanctions did not seem to work in relation to rules compliance during emergency situations. The lack of clarity of regulations in terms of complexity or constant changes led to non-compliance even intervening as a neutralization technique. CONCLUSIONS: government's fear-based interventions did not seem to work since Italians tended to adhere to the rules primarily out of respect for legitimate authority. Future research should focus more on the topic of trust in institutions in emergency situations with the aim of highlighting the key points for successful governance, also in terms of rules compliance.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , População Europeia , Pandemias , Cooperação do Paciente , Humanos , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Cooperação do Paciente/etnologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , População Europeia/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde/etnologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas
3.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 12(1): 31, 2023 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37032366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While 5% of 247 million global malaria cases are reported in Uganda, it is also a top refugee hosting country in Africa, with over 1.36 million refugees. Despite malaria being an emerging challenge for humanitarian response in refugee settlements, little is known about its risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for malaria infections among children under 5 years of age in refugee settlements in Uganda. METHODS: We utilized data from Uganda's Malaria Indicator Survey which was conducted between December 2018 and February 2019 at the peak of malaria season. In this national survey, household level information was obtained using standardized questionnaires and a total of 7787 children under 5 years of age were tested for malaria using mainly the rapid diagnostic test. We focused on 675 malaria tested children under five in refugee settlements located in Yumbe, Arua, Adjumani, Moyo, Lamwo, Kiryadongo, Kyegegwa, Kamwenge and Isingiro districts. The extracted variables included prevalence of malaria, demographic, social-economic and environmental information. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify and define the malaria associated risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, malaria prevalence in all refugee settlements across the nine hosting districts was 36.6%. Malaria infections were higher in refugee settlements located in Isingiro (98.7%), Kyegegwa (58.6%) and Arua (57.4%) districts. Several risk factors were significantly associated with acquisition of malaria including fetching water from open water sources [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P = 0.002], boreholes (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI: 0.91-4.89, P = 0.018) and water tanks (aOR = 4.47, 95% CI: 1.67-11.9, P = 0.002). Other factors included pit-latrines (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.03-2.13, P = 0.033), open defecation (aOR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.54-7.05, P = 0.002), lack of insecticide treated bed nets (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.43-3.13, P = 0.003) and knowledge on the causes of malaria (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.79-1.51, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of the malaria infections were mainly due to open water sources, poor hygiene, and lack of preventive measures that enhanced mosquito survival and infection. Malaria elimination in refugee settlements requires an integrated control approach that combines environmental management with other complementary measures like insecticide treated bed nets, indoor residual spraying and awareness.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Malária , Refugiados , Animais , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Mosquiteiros Tratados com Inseticida/provisão & distribuição , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Uganda/epidemiologia , Água , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Prevalência , Abastecimento de Água/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Toaletes/estatística & dados numéricos , Defecação , Higiene/normas , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Health Serv Manage Res ; 36(3): 193-204, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36373480

RESUMO

The outbreak of COVID-19 in early 2020 created dangerous public health conditions which pressured governments and health systems to respond in a rapid and effective manner. However, this type of rapid response required many governments to bypass standing; bureaucratic structures of health sector administration and political governance to quickly take; essential measures against a rapidly evolving public health threat. Each government's particular; configuration of governmental and health system decision-making created specific structural and functional challenges to these necessary centrally developed and coordinated strategies. Most East Asian governments (except Japan) succeeded relatively quickly in centralizing essential disease control and treatment initiatives in a timely manner. In contrast, a number of European countries, especially those with predominantly tax-based financing and politically managed health delivery systems, had greater difficulty in escaping bureaucratic governance and management constraints. Drawing on data about these governments' early stage COVID-19 control experiences, this article suggests that structural changes will be necessary if low-performing governments are to better respond to a pandemic. This paper also summarizes other relatively successful strategies. By adopting such strategies, nations can help overcome structural bureaucratic and administrative obstacles in responding to further waves of COVID-19 or similar future pandemic events.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Governo , Ásia Oriental/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática de Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 23(8): 546-550, 2022 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35905001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2020 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak entailed reduced availability of traditional (in-office) cardiology consultations. Remote monitoring is an alternative way of caring that may potentially mitigate the negative effects of the epidemic to the care of cardiovascular diseases. We evaluated the outcome of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) carriers followed up remotely in 2020 (epidemic period) versus 2019 (control). METHODS: We included all patients with an ICD who remained remotely monitored from the beginning to the end of each year. The combined end point included: new-onset atrial fibrillation; sustained ventricular tachycardia >170 bpm without ICD intervention; appropriate ICD intervention (either shock or antitachycardia pacing); any-cause death. Multiple events in the same patients were counted separately if occurring ≥48 h apart. RESULTS: In 2020, 52 end points occurred in 37 of 366 (10%) ICD carriers [0.14/patient (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.19)] versus 43 end points in 32 of 325 (10%) ICD carriers in 2019 [0.13/patient (95% CI = 0.10-0.18) P  = 0.75]. There was no difference between the distribution of any individual end point in 2020 versus 2019 although a nonsignificant mortality increase was observed (from 2.8% to 4.6%, P  = 0.19). The lowest weekly event rate occurred during the national lock down in spring 2020 but a similar trend occurred also in 2019 suggesting that the effect may not be linked to social distancing measures. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in a combined end point including arrhythmic events and mortality in ICD carriers who were remotely monitored in 2020, compared to 2019, despite the negative impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Consulta Remota , SARS-CoV-2 , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Consulta Remota/normas , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/prevenção & controle
8.
Lancet ; 399(10325): 678-690, 2022 02 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093206

RESUMO

Measles is a highly contagious, potentially fatal, but vaccine-preventable disease caused by measles virus. Symptoms include fever, maculopapular rash, and at least one of cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis, although vaccinated individuals can have milder or even no symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis relies largely on the detection of specific IgM antibodies in serum, dried blood spots, or oral fluid, or the detection of viral RNA in throat or nasopharyngeal swabs, urine, or oral fluid. Complications can affect many organs and often include otitis media, laryngotracheobronchitis, pneumonia, stomatitis, and diarrhoea. Neurological complications are uncommon but serious, and can occur during or soon after the acute disease (eg, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) or months or even years later (eg, measles inclusion body encephalitis and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis). Patient management mainly involves supportive therapy, such as vitamin A supplementation, monitoring for and treatment of secondary bacterial infections with antibiotics, and rehydration in the case of severe diarrhoea. There is no specific antiviral therapy for the treatment of measles, and disease control largely depends on prevention. However, despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, measles is still endemic in many countries and causes considerable morbidity and mortality, especially among children in resource-poor settings. The low case numbers reported in 2020, after a worldwide resurgence of measles between 2017 and 2019, have to be interpreted cautiously, owing to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on disease surveillance. Disrupted vaccination activities during the pandemic increase the potential for another resurgence of measles in the near future, and effective, timely catch-up vaccination campaigns, strong commitment and leadership, and sufficient resources will be required to mitigate this threat.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Endêmicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Doenças Endêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/normas , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/virologia , Vírus do Sarampo/imunologia , Vírus do Sarampo/patogenicidade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle
11.
J Law Med Ethics ; 50(4): 719-725, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883384

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the challenges of complying with public health guidance to isolate or quarantine without access to adequate income, housing, food, and other resources. When people cannot safely isolate or quarantine during an outbreak of infectious disease, a critical public health strategy fails. This article proposes integrating sociolegal needs screening and services into contact tracing as a way to mitigate public health harms and pandemic-related health inequities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Busca de Comunicante , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Determinação de Necessidades de Cuidados de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Alimentos , Pandemias , Quarentena , Distanciamento Físico , Isolamento de Pacientes , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Fatores Socioeconômicos
13.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 5(2): e1426, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer care during the Covid-19 pandemic has been challenging especially in a developing country such as the Philippines. Oncologists were advised to prioritize chemotherapy based on the absolute benefit that the patient may receive, which outbalances the risks of Covid-19 infection. The results of this study will allow re-examination of how to approach cancer care during the pandemic and ultimately, help optimize treatment recommendations during this crisis. AIM: This study described the factors contributing to treatment delays during the pandemic and their impact on disease progression. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study was done in St. Luke's Medical Center, a private tertiary healthcare institution based in Metro Manila, Philippines, composed of two facilities in Quezon City and Global City. Patients with solid malignancy with ongoing systemic cancer treatment prior to the peak of the pandemic were identified. Clinical characteristics and treatment data were compared between those with delayed and continued treatments. Multivariate analysis was done to determine factors for treatment delays and association of delays with disease progression and Covid-19 infection. Of the 111 patients, 33% experienced treatment delays and 67% continued treatment during the pandemic. There was a higher percentage of patients on palliative intent who underwent treatment delay, and 64% of delays were due to logistic difficulties. Treatment delays were significantly associated with disease progression (p < .0001). There was no evidence of association between delay or continuation of treatment and risk of Covid-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in Covid-19 infection between those who delayed and continued treatment during the pandemic; however, treatment delays were associated with a higher incidence of disease progression. Our findings suggest that the risks of cancer progression due to treatment delays exceed the risks of Covid-19 infection in cancer patients implying that beneficial treatment should not be delayed as much as possible. Logistic hindrances were also identified as the most common cause of treatment delay among Filipino patients, suggesting that efforts should be focused into assistance programs that will mitigate these barriers to ensure continuity of cancer care services during the pandemic.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer/normas , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/imunologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Filipinas/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Arch Dis Child ; 107(2): 180-185, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34045208

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Viral infections may trigger type 1 diabetes (T1D), and recent reports suggest an increased incidence of paediatric T1D and/or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To study whether the number of children admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for DKA due to new-onset T1D increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether SARS-CoV-2 infection plays a role. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprises two datasets: (1) children admitted to PICU due to new-onset T1D and (2) children diagnosed with new-onset T1D and registered to the Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Registry in the Helsinki University Hospital from 1 April to 31 October in 2016-2020. We compared the incidence, number and characteristics of children with newly diagnosed T1D between the prepandemic and pandemic periods. RESULTS: The number of children admitted to PICU due to new-onset T1D increased from an average of 6.25 admissions in 2016-2019 to 20 admissions in 2020 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 3.24 [95% CI 1.80 to 5.83]; p=0.0001). On average, 57.75 children were registered to the FPDR in 2016-2019, as compared with 84 in 2020 (IRR 1.45; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.86; p=0.004). 33 of the children diagnosed in 2020 were analysed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and all were negative. CONCLUSIONS: More children with T1D had severe DKA at diagnosis during the pandemic. This was not a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Instead, it probably stems from delays in diagnosis following changes in parental behaviour and healthcare accessibility.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Diagnóstico Tardio/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Cetoacidose Diabética/diagnóstico , Cetoacidose Diabética/imunologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/terapia , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
16.
Am J Surg ; 223(2): 395-403, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34272062

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The time course and longitudinal impact of the COVID -19 pandemic on surgical education(SE) and learner well-being (LWB)is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Check-in surveys were distributed to Surgery Program Directors and Department Chairs, including general surgery and surgical specialties, in the summer and winter of 2020 and compared to a survey from spring 2020. Statistical associations for items with self-reported ACGME Stage and the survey period were assessed using categorical analysis. RESULTS: Stage 3 institutions were reported in spring (30%), summer (4%) [p < 0.0001] and increased in the winter (18%). Severe disruption (SD) was stage dependent (Stage 3; 45% (83/184) vs. Stages 1 and 2; 26% (206/801)[p < 0.0001]). This lessened in the winter (23%) vs. spring (32%) p = 0.02. LWB severe disruption was similar in spring 27%, summer 22%, winter 25% and was associated with Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: Steps taken during the pandemic reduced SD but did not improve LWB. Systemic efforts are needed to protect learners and combat isolation pervasive in a pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Educação Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Educação Médica/normas , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(12): e455-e458, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34740997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early Years' Settings (EYSs) provide childcare and education for children 0-5 years old. They remained fully open in England during the third National lockdown when other educational settings were only open for selected children. EYSs are generally considered to be low-risk settings for transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2). METHODS: An observational study describing a large outbreak of SARS CoV-2 within an EYS in Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. RESULTS: Overall 45 cases of SARS-CoV-2 were identified; 24 adults (71% of staff members) and 21 children (25% of nursery attendees). One case was identified as the alpha variant (B.1.1.7 [VOC-20-DEC-01]). One staff member became critically unwell. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occurred quickly, with a high attack rate; likely a consequence of a variant with enhanced transmissibility and an inability of the setting to adhere to infection control measures.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/patologia , Creches , Surtos de Doenças , SARS-CoV-2 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...